tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8746692.post8132374309184217317..comments2024-03-29T02:03:49.151-04:00Comments on History Unfolding: Update--review of 42David Kaiserhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05020082243968071584noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8746692.post-72786426753385388592013-04-21T22:14:28.482-04:002013-04-21T22:14:28.482-04:00Aha. Perhaps the piece I was quoting said "hi...Aha. Perhaps the piece I was quoting said "hitless in four trips." David Kaiserhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05020082243968071584noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8746692.post-79521660014202177672013-04-21T22:09:24.462-04:002013-04-21T22:09:24.462-04:00Hi, this is the easiest way for me to comment -- I...Hi, this is the easiest way for me to comment -- I saw your review of 42 at http://www.billjamesonline.com/jackie_robinson_and_42/<br />and I just want to mention that Jackie Robinson didn't go 0-4 on April 14, 1947. He went 0-3 with a sacrifice bunt. He got on base because of an error in the fielding of the sacrifice bunt but he wasn't charged at AB because it was a sacrifice bunt.<br /><br />I was just doing some fact checking for a piece that used the 0-4 stat line so I wondered where he'd gotten it -- since the box scores for the game say 0 for 3. So I looked online. Probably wikianswers is the culprit.<br /><br />Sincerely,<br /><br />Fran Rosen<br />Associate Professor & Librarian<br />Ferris State UniversityUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05123083330097587692noreply@blogger.com