Friday, January 23, 2015

What Balzac can tell us

Last summer, as some of you may recall, I read Stendhal's Le rouge et le noir and tried to start a blog devoted to the discussion of French literary classics. I am convinced there are hundreds of people scattered around the world who would enjoy such discussions, but I was not able to attract them, and the project never got off the ground.  I have however continued it on my own, and I am in the midst of the second of two large novels by Balzac, the first, La cousine Bette, (Cousin Betty) set in the 1830s and early 1840s, and the second, Les Chouans, set in 1799 in the midst of revolutionary struggles in western France.  Today I will be writing about Cousin Betty, which has a great deal more to tell us about our own world.

Balzac wrote a long series of novels about France from the late 18th until the mid-19th century, a series that was interrupted when he died.  He called it the Human Comedy, and he aimed at capturing the totality of life.  He himself was a member of a Prophet generation--indeed, I named his generation the Balzac generation in my article on Western European generations--born in 1799, rather like an American born in 1864 or 1944.  (While the Napoleonic wars continued, of course, until 1815, France itself was quite stable by 1803 and was clearly in a High by that time.)  Balzac was not only keenly aware of the influence of history upon people, but he was very much alive to differences between generations.   He obviously knew hundreds of people who had been young adults during the Revolution, and they play enormous roles in his books, even those like La cousine Bette that are set in much later periods.  Although many of them made fortunes under Napoleon, they tend to be careful and frugal with money, as our own GI generation was.  Balzac has particular respect for the old soldiers of the period, one of whom takes sick and dies in La Cousine Bette because his younger brother has disgraced his family.  In short, by the 1830s and 1840s, the era of the relatively liberal July Monarchy that came to power in 1830, the Napoleonic generation are aging relics of a glorious and more heroic past.  Most of the heroes of these books were either children during the revolution or were born in its wake, like Balzac himself.

Balzac sets his books all around France, but many of the most famous take place in the Paris of the Restoration (1815-30) and the July Monarch (1830 until his own untimely death in 1850.)  There he finds almost no heroes.  The rich in particular care only for social distinction, money, and sex.  Here and there, a lonely artist toils, like Balzac himself, to please a public lacking in taste, and some young men reach Paris determined to do good, but generally fail.  Here in the United States it took us at least 40 years after our last great crisis--that is, until the 1980s--to reach this state, captured so well by Tom Wolfe, a Balzac fan himself, in The Bonfire of the Vanities.  In France this happened almost instantaneously, perhaps because Napoleon had in the end lost the war, and a new elite had taken power composed largely of emigres who had spent the Napoleonic era in exile.  The society is, of course, utterly inegalitarian, and Thomas Piketty cited Balzac, along with Jane Austen, to illustrate the key features of societies dominated by inherited wealth.  The drama of Balzac's novels, including La Cousine Bette, often comes from rich men's tendency to squander all their wealth in pursuit of pleasure.  Women, meanwhile, scheme to share in the available riches by selling their companionship and their bodies.  Balzac even coined his own word, a "lorette," for beauties of the stage and the opera who became the high-priced mistresses of bankers and nobles.

What is lacking in Balzac's Paris is exactly what is lacking in the United States today: any widespread devotion to something larger than one's self.  That is why Balzac obviously feels nostalgia for the Napoleonic era even though he is a believing Catholic and a monarchist, just as the United States in the 1990s was seized by a fit of nostalgia for the era of the GI generation.  That is why most of his heroes are solitary artists.  Near the very end of La Cousine Bette I discovered this remarkable passage, delivered by a doctor, speaking to a virtuous woman who has heroically tolerated her husband's escapades for decades, and who now devotes herself to charitable work among the poor.


“This is the law of society.  The confessor, the judge, and lawyer would be helpless if the  state did not subjugate the human spirit. . .We, we have the pleasure of a successful cure, just as you have the joy of saving a family from horrible hunger, misery and poverty by finding it work; but what solace is there for the judge, the police commissioner or the lawyer, who spend their lives searching among the most heinous conspiracies of ambition, that social  monster that knows the pain of failure but never feels repentance? 

“Whence comes this great evil?” asked the baroness.
  
“From the lack of religion,” he replied, “and from the rule of finance, which is nothing but pure egotism.  Money in other times was not everything, one recognized other things of greater value.  There was nobility, talent, and service to the state; but today the law makes money a universal standard of value and the basis of political power!  Certain magistrates are no long eligible for it, Jean-Jacques Rousseau would not be eligible!  The endless division of inheritances forces everyone to think only of himself from the age of twenty onwards. And the need to make one’s fortune leads easily to depraved schemes, because the religious spirit is lacking in France, despite the efforts of those working for a Catholic restoration.  That is the opinion of all those who, like me, see into the bowels of society.”

Sadly, even the rhetoric of President Obama's State of the Union address hardly recognizes values greater than money.  "Middle class economics" simply argues, accurately to be sure, that some have much too much while most of the nation has too little.  But we too need "other things of greater value" such as nobility (of spirit), talent, and service to the state.  We are at a disadvantage in some of our overseas struggles because militant Muslims find things of greater value in service to their religion, however misguided they may be.  Balzac, by telling us that society has been here before, opens up the hope that it may some day escape again, as well. 




2 comments:

ed boyle said...

What free time I have I try to keep up on rapidly changing current events. However like you I find that reading older more basic works is very instructive in times of crisis to gain perspective on present reality. I had started reading the 1951 detective novel in french by simenon 'lettres a mon juge' and the mind set is quite different to today. I had also read a short story by Eric-Emmanuell Schmitt 'Monsieur Ibrahim et les fleurs du Coran'. Madame Bovary in original was a bit too difficult for me after some chapters.I try to read difficult works in german or english, in which I am fluent. In this way I can learn more in shorter time. For example Toynbee and Spengler are from another era, write in a difficult to understand way so that it slows one down like reading a foreign language.

At any rate the generational theory is a god send for literary interpretation. Imagine Dickens, Shakespeare interpretations inhigh school lit courses. I read mill on the floss 1860-Tess of the durbervilles-1890s started portrait of a lady-1880s-with different-cyclical concepts of understanding. If I can see the first book as similar to 1940 and the other two as 60s to 70s similar then my personal understanding becomes more personal. I get it. They are not boring. The same is true of history in general. My Dad was like the young soldiers in Napoleonic wars or WWI vets in 20s-30s, great gatsby, tender is the night are like vietnam war or iraq war vets before and after 2008 crisis. Otherwise history, literature becomes a linear vacuum to be ignored as apparently, according to Spengler, the grecoromans ignored history.

The greater picture I have recently picked up on is the greater civilizational cycle. The West has peaked, is going into winter phase. So we have 200-250 years, or 2-3 80-100 year cycles declining into cultural dark age. Roman empire at height was similarly corrupt.

I have read you for a while and you keep to US history, your calling. Western history as a whole in such a cyclical perspective from say 1200 to 2200 would take us the whole cycle through but of course this is unsubstantial and ovrgeneralized unless like toynbee one writes 7000 pages or like spengler in very deep philosophical concepts.

The 'Generations' book did a good job with England from 1600 to modern USA, 400 years. Spengler and Toynbee were of a different, European, intellectual class, with deep knowledge of classics, world history, philosophy. People born since WW II do not have such a background. My mother learned Greek and Latin in English school in 30s-40s as a matter of course but was more intereested in living languages. Sciences, technical training, business has taken precedence.

Spengler would compare this with commercialization of art in roman times or perhaps 19th century.

So combining generational and civilizational analysis would be very fruitful. Hero generation in 17th century fighting indians as opposed to hero generation 2100 being destroyed by climate change, coalition of foreign armies invadind usa. A rising optimistic culture vs. a declining one. We can learn lots from Europe, more from Rome.

Assurance-First-Assurance said...

Thank you for this post. Generally, I tend to think that we have reached and discovered new depravities all by ourselves. But I have hopes that you are right and someday, long after we are gone, things will be better for the spirit and for the flesh.

That it will not be ours is fine. As long as it returns for others who care.

Thanks

JIm